Chris Lu 2ec0a67ee3 master: return 503/Unavailable during topology warmup after leader change (#8529)
* master: return 503/Unavailable during topology warmup after leader change

After a master restart or leader change, the topology is empty until
volume servers reconnect and send heartbeats. During this warmup window
(3 heartbeat intervals = 15 seconds), volume lookups that fail now
return 503 Service Unavailable (HTTP) or gRPC Unavailable instead of
404 Not Found, signaling clients to retry with other masters.

* master: skip warmup 503 on fresh start and single-master setups

- Check MaxVolumeId > 0 to distinguish restart from fresh start
  (MaxVolumeId is Raft-persisted, so 0 means no prior data)
- Check peer count > 1 so single-master deployments aren't affected
  (no point suggesting "retry with other masters" if there are none)

* master: address review feedback and block assigns during warmup

- Protect LastLeaderChangeTime with dedicated mutex (fix data race)
- Extract warmup multiplier as WarmupPulseMultiplier constant
- Derive Retry-After header from pulse config instead of hardcoding
- Only trigger warmup 503 for "not found" errors, not parse errors
- Return nil response (not partial) on gRPC Unavailable
- Add doc comments to IsWarmingUp, getter/setter, WarmupDuration
- Block volume assign requests (HTTP and gRPC) during warmup,
  since the topology is incomplete and assignments would be unreliable
- Skip warmup behavior for single-master setups (no peers to retry)

* master: apply warmup to all setups, skip only on fresh start

Single-master restarts still have an empty topology until heartbeats
arrive, so warmup protection should apply there too. The only case
to skip is a fresh cluster start (MaxVolumeId == 0), which already
has no volumes to look up.

- Remove GetMasterCount() > 1 guard from all warmup checks
- Remove now-unused GetMasterCount helper
- Update error messages to "topology is still loading" (not
  "retry with other masters" which doesn't apply to single-master)

* master: add client-side retry on Unavailable for lookup and assign

The server-side 503/Unavailable during warmup needs client cooperation.
Previously, LookupVolumeIds and Assign would immediately propagate the
error without retry.

Now both paths retry with exponential backoff (1s -> 1.5s -> ... up to
6s) when receiving Unavailable, respecting context cancellation. This
covers the warmup window where the master's topology is still loading
after a restart or leader change.

* master: seed warmup timestamp in legacy raft path at setup

The legacy raft path only set lastLeaderChangeTime inside the event
listener callback, which could fire after IsLeader() was already
observed as true in SetRaftServer. Seed the timestamp at setup time
(matching the hashicorp path) so IsWarmingUp() is active immediately.

* master: fix assign retry loop to cover full warmup window

The retry loop used waitTime <= maxWaitTime as a stop condition,
causing it to give up after ~13s while warmup lasts 15s. Now cap
each individual sleep at maxWaitTime but keep retrying until the
context is cancelled.

* master: preserve gRPC status in lookup retry and fix retry window

Return the raw gRPC error instead of wrapping with fmt.Errorf so
status.FromError() can extract the status code. Use proper gRPC
status check (codes.Unavailable) instead of string matching. Also
cap individual sleep at maxWaitTime while retrying until ctx is done.

* master: use gRPC status code instead of string matching in assign retry

Use status.FromError/codes.Unavailable instead of brittle
strings.Contains for detecting retriable gRPC errors in the
assign retry loop.

* master: use remaining warmup duration for Retry-After header

Set Retry-After to the remaining warmup time instead of the full
warmup duration, so clients don't wait longer than necessary.

* master: reset ret.Replicas before populating from assign response

Clear Replicas slice before appending to prevent duplicate entries
when the assign response is retried or when alternative requests
are attempted.

* master: add unit tests for warmup retry behavior

Test that Assign() and LookupVolumeIds() retry on codes.Unavailable
and stop promptly when the context is cancelled.

* master: record leader change time before initialization work

Move SetLastLeaderChangeTime() to fire immediately when the leader
change event is received, before DoBarrier(), EnsureTopologyId(),
and updatePeers(), so the warmup clock starts at the true moment
of leadership transition.

* master: use topology warmup duration in volume growth wait loop

Replace hardcoded constants.VolumePulsePeriod * 2 with
topo.IsWarmingUp() and topo.WarmupDuration() so the growth wait
stays in sync with the configured warmup window. Remove unused
constants import.

* master: resolve master before creating RPC timeout context

Move GetMaster() call before context.WithTimeout() so master
resolution blocking doesn't consume the gRPC call timeout.

* master: use NotFound flag instead of string matching for volume lookup

Add a NotFound field to LookupResult and set it in findVolumeLocation
when a volume is genuinely missing. Update HTTP and gRPC warmup
checks to use this flag instead of strings.Contains on the error
message.

* master: bound assign retry loop to 30s for deadline-free contexts

Without a context deadline, the Unavailable retry loop could spin
forever. Add a maxRetryDuration of 30s so the loop gives up even
when no context deadline is set.

* master: strengthen assign retry cancellation test

Verify the retry loop actually retried (callCount > 1) and that
the returned error is context.DeadlineExceeded, not just any error.

* master: extract shared retry-with-backoff utility

Add util.RetryWithBackoff for context-aware, bounded retry with
exponential backoff. Refactor both Assign() and LookupVolumeIds()
to use it instead of duplicating the retry/sleep/backoff logic.

* master: cap waitTime in RetryWithBackoff to prevent unbounded growth

Cap the backoff waitTime at maxWaitTime so it doesn't grow
indefinitely in long-running retry scenarios.

* master: only return Unavailable during warmup when all lookups failed

For batched LookupVolume requests, return partial results when some
volumes are found. Only return codes.Unavailable when no volumes
were successfully resolved, so clients benefit from partial results
instead of retrying unnecessarily.

* master: set retriable error message in 503 response body

When returning 503 during warmup, replace the "not found" error
in the JSON body with "service warming up, please retry" so
clients don't treat it as a permanent error.

* master: guard empty master address in LookupVolumeIds

If GetMaster() returns empty (no master found or ctx cancelled),
return an appropriate error instead of dialing an empty address.
Returns ctx.Err() if context is done, otherwise codes.Unavailable
to trigger retry.

* master: add comprehensive tests for RetryWithBackoff

Test success after retries, non-retryable error handling, context
cancellation, and maxDuration cap with context.Background().

* master: enforce hard maxDuration bound in RetryWithBackoff

Use a deadline instead of elapsed-time check so the last sleep is
capped to remaining time. This prevents the total retry duration
from overshooting maxDuration by up to one full backoff interval.

* master: respect fresh-start bypass in RemainingWarmupDuration

Check IsWarmingUp() first (which returns false when MaxVolumeId==0)
so RemainingWarmupDuration returns 0 on fresh clusters.

* master: round up Retry-After seconds to avoid underestimating

Use math.Ceil so fractional remaining seconds (e.g. 1.9s) round
up to the next integer (2) instead of flooring down (1).

* master: tighten batch lookup warmup to all-NotFound only

Only return codes.Unavailable when every requested volume ID was
a transient not-found. Mixed cases with non-NotFound errors now
return the response with per-volume error details preserved.

* master: reduce retry log noise and fix timer leak

Lower per-attempt retry log from V(0) to V(1) to reduce noise
during warmup. Replace time.After with time.NewTimer to avoid
lingering timers when context is cancelled.

* master: add per-attempt timeout for assign RPC

Use a 10s per-attempt timeout so a single slow RPC can't consume
the entire 30s retry budget when ctx has no deadline.

* master: share single 30s retry deadline across assign request entries

The Assign() function iterates over primary and fallback requests,
previously giving each its own 30s RetryWithBackoff budget. With a
primary + fallback, the total could reach 60s. Compute one deadline
up front and pass the remaining budget to each RetryWithBackoff call
so the entire Assign() call stays within a single 30s cap.

* master: strengthen context-cancel test with DeadlineExceeded and retry assertions

Assert errors.Is(err, context.DeadlineExceeded) to verify the error
is specifically from the context deadline, and check callCount > 1
to prove retries actually occurred before cancellation. Mirrors the
pattern used in TestAssignStopsOnContextCancel.

* master: bound GetMaster with per-attempt timeout in LookupVolumeIds

GetMaster() calls WaitUntilConnected() which can block indefinitely
if no master is available. Previously it used the outer ctx, so a
slow master resolution could consume the entire RetryWithBackoff
budget in a single attempt. Move the per-attempt timeoutCtx creation
before the GetMaster call so both master resolution and the gRPC
LookupVolume RPC share one grpcTimeout-bounded attempt.

* master: use deadline-aware context for assign retry budget

The shared 30s deadline only limited RetryWithBackoff's internal
wall-clock tracking, but per-attempt contexts were still derived
from the original ctx and could run for up to 10s even when the
budget was nearly exhausted. Create a deadlineCtx from the computed
deadline and derive both RetryWithBackoff and per-attempt timeouts
from it so all operations honor the shared 30s cap.

* master: skip warmup gate for empty lookup requests

When VolumeOrFileIds is empty, notFoundCount == len(req.VolumeOrFileIds)
is 0 == 0 which is true, causing empty lookup batches during warmup to
return codes.Unavailable and be retried endlessly. Add a
len(req.VolumeOrFileIds) > 0 guard so empty requests pass through.

* master: validate request fields before warmup gate in Assign

Move Replication and Ttl parsing before the IsWarmingUp() check so
invalid inputs get a proper validation error instead of being masked
by codes.Unavailable during warmup. Pure syntactic validation does
not depend on topology state and should run first.

* master: check deadline and context before starting retry attempt

RetryWithBackoff only checked the deadline and context after an
attempt completed or during the sleep select. If the deadline
expired or context was canceled during sleep, the next iteration
would still call operation() before detecting it. Add pre-operation
checks so no new attempt starts after the budget is exhausted.

* master: always return ctx.Err() on context cancellation in RetryWithBackoff

When ctx.Err() is non-nil, the pre-operation check was returning
lastErr instead of ctx.Err(). This broke callers checking
errors.Is(err, context.DeadlineExceeded) and contradicted the
documented contract. Always return ctx.Err() so the cancellation
reason is properly surfaced.

* master: handle warmup errors in StreamAssign without killing the stream

StreamAssign was returning codes.Unavailable errors from Assign
directly, which terminates the gRPC stream and breaks pooled
connections. Instead, return transient errors as in-band error
responses so the stream survives warmup periods.

Also reset assignClient in doAssign on Send/Recv failures so a
broken stream doesn't leave the proxy permanently dead.

* master: wait for warmup before slot search in findAndGrow

findEmptySlotsForOneVolume was called before the warmup wait loop,
selecting slots from an incomplete topology. Move the warmup wait
before slot search so volume placement uses the fully warmed-up
topology with all servers registered.

* master: add Retry-After header to /dir/assign warmup response

The /dir/lookup handler already sets Retry-After during warmup but
/dir/assign did not, leaving HTTP clients without guidance on when
to retry. Add the same header using RemainingWarmupDuration().

* master: only seed warmup timestamp on leader at startup

SetLastLeaderChangeTime was called unconditionally for both leader
and follower nodes. Followers don't need warmup state, and the
leader change event listener handles real elections. Move the seed
into the IsLeader() block so only the startup leader gets warmup
initialized.

* master: preserve codes.Unavailable for StreamAssign warmup errors in doAssign

StreamAssign returns transient warmup errors as in-band
AssignResponse.Error messages. doAssign was converting these to plain
fmt.Errorf, losing the codes.Unavailable classification needed for
the caller's retry logic. Detect warmup error messages and wrap them
as status.Error(codes.Unavailable) so RetryWithBackoff can retry.
2026-03-08 16:05:45 -07:00
2026-01-20 14:12:14 -08:00
2026-02-20 18:42:00 -08:00
2019-04-30 03:23:20 +00:00
2026-01-27 17:27:02 -08:00
2023-01-05 11:01:22 -08:00

SeaweedFS

Slack Twitter Build Status GoDoc Wiki Docker Pulls SeaweedFS on Maven Central Artifact Hub

SeaweedFS Logo

Sponsor SeaweedFS via Patreon

SeaweedFS is an independent Apache-licensed open source project with its ongoing development made possible entirely thanks to the support of these awesome backers. If you'd like to grow SeaweedFS even stronger, please consider joining our sponsors on Patreon.

Your support will be really appreciated by me and other supporters!

Gold Sponsors

nodion piknik keepsec


Table of Contents

Quick Start

Quick Start with weed mini

The easiest way to get started with SeaweedFS for development and testing:

Example:

# remove quarantine on macOS
# xattr -d com.apple.quarantine  ./weed

./weed mini -dir=/data

This single command starts a complete SeaweedFS setup with:

Perfect for development, testing, learning SeaweedFS, and single node deployments!

Quick Start for S3 API on Docker

docker run -p 8333:8333 chrislusf/seaweedfs server -s3

Quick Start with Single Binary

  • Download the latest binary from https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/releases and unzip a single binary file weed or weed.exe. Or run go install github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed@latest.
  • export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=admin ; export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=key as the admin credentials to access the object store.
  • Run weed server -dir=/some/data/dir -s3 to start one master, one volume server, one filer, and one S3 gateway. The difference with weed mini is that weed mini can auto configure based on the single host environment, while weed server requires manual configuration and are designed for production use.

Also, to increase capacity, just add more volume servers by running weed volume -dir="/some/data/dir2" -master="<master_host>:9333" -port=8081 locally, or on a different machine, or on thousands of machines. That is it!

Introduction

SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system. There are two objectives:

  1. to store billions of files!
  2. to serve the files fast!

SeaweedFS started as a blob store to handle small files efficiently. Instead of managing all file metadata in a central master, the central master only manages volumes on volume servers, and these volume servers manage files and their metadata. This relieves concurrency pressure from the central master and spreads file metadata into volume servers, allowing faster file access (O(1), usually just one disk read operation).

There is only 40 bytes of disk storage overhead for each file's metadata. It is so simple with O(1) disk reads that you are welcome to challenge the performance with your actual use cases.

SeaweedFS started by implementing Facebook's Haystack design paper. Also, SeaweedFS implements erasure coding with ideas from f4: Facebooks Warm BLOB Storage System, and has a lot of similarities with Facebooks Tectonic Filesystem and Google's Colossus File System

On top of the blob store, optional Filer can support directories and POSIX attributes. Filer is a separate linearly-scalable stateless server with customizable metadata stores, e.g., MySql, Postgres, Redis, Cassandra, HBase, Mongodb, Elastic Search, LevelDB, RocksDB, Sqlite, MemSql, TiDB, Etcd, CockroachDB, YDB, etc.

SeaweedFS can transparently integrate with the cloud. With hot data on local cluster, and warm data on the cloud with O(1) access time, SeaweedFS can achieve both fast local access time and elastic cloud storage capacity. What's more, the cloud storage access API cost is minimized. Faster and cheaper than direct cloud storage!

Back to TOC

Features

Additional Blob Store Features

  • Support different replication levels, with rack and data center aware.
  • Automatic master servers failover - no single point of failure (SPOF).
  • Automatic compression depending on file MIME type.
  • Automatic compaction to reclaim disk space after deletion or update.
  • Automatic entry TTL expiration.
  • Flexible Capacity Expansion: Any server with some disk space can add to the total storage space.
  • Adding/Removing servers does not cause any data re-balancing unless triggered by admin commands.
  • Optional picture resizing.
  • Support ETag, Accept-Range, Last-Modified, etc.
  • Support in-memory/leveldb/readonly mode tuning for memory/performance balance.
  • Support rebalancing the writable and readonly volumes.
  • Customizable Multiple Storage Tiers: Customizable storage disk types to balance performance and cost.
  • Transparent cloud integration: unlimited capacity via tiered cloud storage for warm data.
  • Erasure Coding for warm storage Rack-Aware 10.4 erasure coding reduces storage cost and increases availability. Enterprise version can customize EC ratio.

Back to TOC

Filer Features

Kubernetes

Back to TOC

Example: Using Seaweed Blob Store

By default, the master node runs on port 9333, and the volume nodes run on port 8080. Let's start one master node, and two volume nodes on port 8080 and 8081. Ideally, they should be started from different machines. We'll use localhost as an example.

SeaweedFS uses HTTP REST operations to read, write, and delete. The responses are in JSON or JSONP format.

Start Master Server

> ./weed master

Start Volume Servers

> weed volume -dir="/tmp/data1" -max=5  -master="localhost:9333" -port=8080 &
> weed volume -dir="/tmp/data2" -max=10 -master="localhost:9333" -port=8081 &

Write A Blob

A blob, also referred as a needle, a chunk, or mistakenly as a file, is just a byte array. It can have attributes, such as name, mime type, create or update time, etc. But basically it is just a byte array of a relatively small size, such as 2 MB ~ 64 MB. The size is not fixed.

To upload a blob: first, send a HTTP POST, PUT, or GET request to /dir/assign to get an fid and a volume server URL:

> curl http://localhost:9333/dir/assign
{"count":1,"fid":"3,01637037d6","url":"127.0.0.1:8080","publicUrl":"localhost:8080"}

Second, to store the blob content, send a HTTP multi-part POST request to url + '/' + fid from the response:

> curl -F file=@/home/chris/myphoto.jpg http://127.0.0.1:8080/3,01637037d6
{"name":"myphoto.jpg","size":43234,"eTag":"1cc0118e"}

To update, send another POST request with updated blob content.

For deletion, send an HTTP DELETE request to the same url + '/' + fid URL:

> curl -X DELETE http://127.0.0.1:8080/3,01637037d6

Save Blob Id

Now, you can save the fid, 3,01637037d6 in this case, to a database field.

The number 3 at the start represents a volume id. After the comma, it's one file key, 01, and a file cookie, 637037d6.

The volume id is an unsigned 32-bit integer. The file key is an unsigned 64-bit integer. The file cookie is an unsigned 32-bit integer, used to prevent URL guessing.

The file key and file cookie are both coded in hex. You can store the <volume id, file key, file cookie> tuple in your own format, or simply store the fid as a string.

If stored as a string, in theory, you would need 8+1+16+8=33 bytes. A char(33) would be enough, if not more than enough, since most uses will not need 2^32 volumes.

If space is really a concern, you can store the file id in the binary format. You would need one 4-byte integer for volume id, 8-byte long number for file key, and a 4-byte integer for the file cookie. So 16 bytes are more than enough.

Read a Blob

Here is an example of how to render the URL.

First look up the volume server's URLs by the file's volumeId:

> curl http://localhost:9333/dir/lookup?volumeId=3
{"volumeId":"3","locations":[{"publicUrl":"localhost:8080","url":"localhost:8080"}]}

Since (usually) there are not too many volume servers, and volumes don't move often, you can cache the results most of the time. Depending on the replication type, one volume can have multiple replica locations. Just randomly pick one location to read.

Now you can take the public URL, render the URL or directly read from the volume server via URL:

 http://localhost:8080/3,01637037d6.jpg

Notice we add a file extension ".jpg" here. It's optional and just one way for the client to specify the file content type.

If you want a nicer URL, you can use one of these alternative URL formats:

 http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6/my_preferred_name.jpg
 http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6.jpg
 http://localhost:8080/3,01637037d6.jpg
 http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6
 http://localhost:8080/3,01637037d6

If you want to get a scaled version of an image, you can add some params:

http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6.jpg?height=200&width=200
http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6.jpg?height=200&width=200&mode=fit
http://localhost:8080/3/01637037d6.jpg?height=200&width=200&mode=fill

Rack-Aware and Data Center-Aware Replication

SeaweedFS applies the replication strategy at a volume level. So, when you are getting a blob id, you can specify the replication strategy. For example:

curl http://localhost:9333/dir/assign?replication=001

The replication parameter options are:

000: no replication
001: replicate once on the same rack
010: replicate once on a different rack, but same data center
100: replicate once on a different data center
200: replicate twice on two different data center
110: replicate once on a different rack, and once on a different data center

More details about replication can be found on the wiki.

You can also set the default replication strategy when starting the master server.

Allocate Blob Key on Specific Data Center

Volume servers can be started with a specific data center name:

 weed volume -dir=/tmp/1 -port=8080 -dataCenter=dc1
 weed volume -dir=/tmp/2 -port=8081 -dataCenter=dc2

When requesting a blob key, an optional "dataCenter" parameter can limit the assigned volume to the specific data center. For example, this specifies that the assigned volume should be limited to 'dc1':

 http://localhost:9333/dir/assign?dataCenter=dc1

Other Features

Back to TOC

Blob Store Architecture

Usually distributed file systems split each file into chunks. A central server keeps a mapping of filenames to chunks, and also which chunks each chunk server has.

The main drawback is that the central server can't handle many small files efficiently, and since all read requests need to go through the central master, so it might not scale well for many concurrent users.

Instead of managing chunks, SeaweedFS manages data volumes in the master server. Each data volume is 32GB in size, and can hold a lot of blobs. And each storage node can have many data volumes. So the master node only needs to store the metadata about the volumes, which is a fairly small amount of data and is generally stable.

The actual blob metadata, which are the blob volume, offset, and size, is stored in each volume on volume servers. Since each volume server only manages metadata of blobs on its own disk, with only 16 bytes for each blob, all access can read the metadata just from memory and only needs one disk operation to actually read file data.

For comparison, consider that an xfs inode structure in Linux is 536 bytes.

Master Server and Volume Server

The architecture is fairly simple. The actual data is stored in volumes on storage nodes. One volume server can have multiple volumes, and can both support read and write access with basic authentication.

All volumes are managed by a master server. The master server contains the volume id to volume server mapping. This is fairly static information, and can be easily cached.

On each write request, the master server also generates a file key, which is a growing 64-bit unsigned integer. Since write requests are not generally as frequent as read requests, one master server should be able to handle the concurrency well.

Write and Read files

When a client sends a write request, the master server returns (volume id, file key, file cookie, volume node URL) for the blob. The client then contacts the volume node and POSTs the blob content.

When a client needs to read a blob based on (volume id, file key, file cookie), it asks the master server by the volume id for the (volume node URL, volume node public URL), or retrieves this from a cache. Then the client can GET the content, or just render the URL on web pages and let browsers fetch the content.

Saving memory

All blob metadata stored on a volume server is readable from memory without disk access. Each file takes just a 16-byte map entry of <64bit key, 32bit offset, 32bit size>. Of course, each map entry has its own space cost for the map. But usually the disk space runs out before the memory does.

Tiered Storage to the cloud

The local volume servers are much faster, while cloud storages have elastic capacity and are actually more cost-efficient if not accessed often (usually free to upload, but relatively costly to access). With the append-only structure and O(1) access time, SeaweedFS can take advantage of both local and cloud storage by offloading the warm data to the cloud.

Usually hot data are fresh and warm data are old. SeaweedFS puts the newly created volumes on local servers, and optionally upload the older volumes on the cloud. If the older data are accessed less often, this literally gives you unlimited capacity with limited local servers, and still fast for new data.

With the O(1) access time, the network latency cost is kept at minimum.

If the hot/warm data is split as 20/80, with 20 servers, you can achieve storage capacity of 100 servers. That's a cost saving of 80%! Or you can repurpose the 80 servers to store new data also, and get 5X storage throughput.

Back to TOC

SeaweedFS Filer

Built on top of the blob store, SeaweedFS Filer adds directory structure to create a file system. The directory sturcture is an interface that is implemented in many key-value stores or databases.

The content of a file is mapped to one or many blobs, distributed to multiple volumes on multiple volume servers.

Compared to Other File Systems

Most other distributed file systems seem more complicated than necessary.

SeaweedFS is meant to be fast and simple, in both setup and operation. If you do not understand how it works when you reach here, we've failed! Please raise an issue with any questions or update this file with clarifications.

SeaweedFS is constantly moving forward. Same with other systems. These comparisons can be outdated quickly. Please help to keep them updated.

Back to TOC

Compared to HDFS

HDFS uses the chunk approach for each file, and is ideal for storing large files.

SeaweedFS is ideal for serving relatively smaller files quickly and concurrently.

SeaweedFS can also store extra large files by splitting them into manageable data chunks, and store the file ids of the data chunks into a meta chunk. This is managed by "weed upload/download" tool, and the weed master or volume servers are agnostic about it.

Back to TOC

Compared to GlusterFS, Ceph

The architectures are mostly the same. SeaweedFS aims to store and read files fast, with a simple and flat architecture. The main differences are

  • SeaweedFS optimizes for small files, ensuring O(1) disk seek operation, and can also handle large files.
  • SeaweedFS statically assigns a volume id for a file. Locating file content becomes just a lookup of the volume id, which can be easily cached.
  • SeaweedFS Filer metadata store can be any well-known and proven data store, e.g., Redis, Cassandra, HBase, Mongodb, Elastic Search, MySql, Postgres, Sqlite, MemSql, TiDB, CockroachDB, Etcd, YDB etc, and is easy to customize.
  • SeaweedFS Volume server also communicates directly with clients via HTTP, supporting range queries, direct uploads, etc.
System File Metadata File Content Read POSIX REST API Optimized for large number of small files
SeaweedFS lookup volume id, cacheable O(1) disk seek Yes Yes
SeaweedFS Filer Linearly Scalable, Customizable O(1) disk seek FUSE Yes Yes
GlusterFS hashing FUSE, NFS
Ceph hashing + rules FUSE Yes
MooseFS in memory FUSE No
MinIO separate meta file for each file Yes No

Back to TOC

Compared to GlusterFS

GlusterFS stores files, both directories and content, in configurable volumes called "bricks".

GlusterFS hashes the path and filename into ids, and assigned to virtual volumes, and then mapped to "bricks".

Back to TOC

Compared to MooseFS

MooseFS chooses to neglect small file issue. From moosefs 3.0 manual, "even a small file will occupy 64KiB plus additionally 4KiB of checksums and 1KiB for the header", because it "was initially designed for keeping large amounts (like several thousands) of very big files"

MooseFS Master Server keeps all meta data in memory. Same issue as HDFS namenode.

Back to TOC

Compared to Ceph

Ceph can be setup similar to SeaweedFS as a key->blob store. It is much more complicated, with the need to support layers on top of it. Here is a more detailed comparison

SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage.

Ceph, like SeaweedFS, is based on the object store RADOS. Ceph is rather complicated with mixed reviews.

Ceph uses CRUSH hashing to automatically manage data placement, which is efficient to locate the data. But the data has to be placed according to the CRUSH algorithm. Any wrong configuration would cause data loss. Topology changes, such as adding new servers to increase capacity, will cause data migration with high IO cost to fit the CRUSH algorithm. SeaweedFS places data by assigning them to any writable volumes. If writes to one volume failed, just pick another volume to write. Adding more volumes is also as simple as it can be.

SeaweedFS is optimized for small files. Small files are stored as one continuous block of content, with at most 8 unused bytes between files. Small file access is O(1) disk read.

SeaweedFS Filer uses off-the-shelf stores, such as MySql, Postgres, Sqlite, Mongodb, Redis, Elastic Search, Cassandra, HBase, MemSql, TiDB, CockroachCB, Etcd, YDB, to manage file directories. These stores are proven, scalable, and easier to manage.

SeaweedFS comparable to Ceph advantage
Master MDS simpler
Volume OSD optimized for small files
Filer Ceph FS linearly scalable, Customizable, O(1) or O(logN)

Back to TOC

Compared to MinIO

MinIO follows AWS S3 closely and is ideal for testing for S3 API. It has good UI, policies, versionings, etc. SeaweedFS is trying to catch up here. It is also possible to put MinIO as a gateway in front of SeaweedFS later.

MinIO metadata are in simple files. Each file write will incur extra writes to corresponding meta file.

MinIO does not have optimization for lots of small files. The files are simply stored as is to local disks. Plus the extra meta file and shards for erasure coding, it only amplifies the LOSF problem.

MinIO has multiple disk IO to read one file. SeaweedFS has O(1) disk reads, even for erasure coded files.

MinIO has full-time erasure coding. SeaweedFS uses replication on hot data for faster speed and optionally applies erasure coding on warm data.

MinIO does not have POSIX-like API support.

MinIO has specific requirements on storage layout. It is not flexible to adjust capacity. In SeaweedFS, just start one volume server pointing to the master. That's all.

Dev Plan

  • More tools and documentation, on how to manage and scale the system.
  • Read and write stream data.
  • Support structured data.

This is a super exciting project! And we need helpers and support!

Back to TOC

Installation Guide

Installation guide for users who are not familiar with golang

Step 1: install go on your machine and setup the environment by following the instructions at:

https://golang.org/doc/install

make sure to define your $GOPATH

Step 2: checkout this repo:

git clone https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git

Step 3: download, compile, and install the project by executing the following command

cd seaweedfs/weed && make install

Once this is done, you will find the executable "weed" in your $GOPATH/bin directory

For more installation options, including how to run with Docker, see the Getting Started guide.

Back to TOC

Hard Drive Performance

When testing read performance on SeaweedFS, it basically becomes a performance test of your hard drive's random read speed. Hard drives usually get 100MB/s~200MB/s.

Solid State Disk

To modify or delete small files, SSD must delete a whole block at a time, and move content in existing blocks to a new block. SSD is fast when brand new, but will get fragmented over time and you have to garbage collect, compacting blocks. SeaweedFS is friendly to SSD since it is append-only. Deletion and compaction are done on volume level in the background, not slowing reading and not causing fragmentation.

Back to TOC

Benchmark

My Own Unscientific Single Machine Results on Mac Book with Solid State Disk, CPU: 1 Intel Core i7 2.6GHz.

Write 1 million 1KB file:

Concurrency Level:      16
Time taken for tests:   66.753 seconds
Completed requests:      1048576
Failed requests:        0
Total transferred:      1106789009 bytes
Requests per second:    15708.23 [#/sec]
Transfer rate:          16191.69 [Kbytes/sec]

Connection Times (ms)
              min      avg        max      std
Total:        0.3      1.0       84.3      0.9

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
   50%      0.8 ms
   66%      1.0 ms
   75%      1.1 ms
   80%      1.2 ms
   90%      1.4 ms
   95%      1.7 ms
   98%      2.1 ms
   99%      2.6 ms
  100%     84.3 ms

Randomly read 1 million files:

Concurrency Level:      16
Time taken for tests:   22.301 seconds
Completed requests:      1048576
Failed requests:        0
Total transferred:      1106812873 bytes
Requests per second:    47019.38 [#/sec]
Transfer rate:          48467.57 [Kbytes/sec]

Connection Times (ms)
              min      avg        max      std
Total:        0.0      0.3       54.1      0.2

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
   50%      0.3 ms
   90%      0.4 ms
   98%      0.6 ms
   99%      0.7 ms
  100%     54.1 ms

Run WARP and launch a mixed benchmark.

make benchmark
warp: Benchmark data written to "warp-mixed-2025-12-05[194844]-kBpU.csv.zst"

Mixed operations.
Operation: DELETE, 10%, Concurrency: 20, Ran 42s.
 * Throughput: 55.13 obj/s

Operation: GET, 45%, Concurrency: 20, Ran 42s.
 * Throughput: 2477.45 MiB/s, 247.75 obj/s

Operation: PUT, 15%, Concurrency: 20, Ran 42s.
 * Throughput: 825.85 MiB/s, 82.59 obj/s

Operation: STAT, 30%, Concurrency: 20, Ran 42s.
 * Throughput: 165.27 obj/s

Cluster Total: 3302.88 MiB/s, 550.51 obj/s over 43s.

Back to TOC

Enterprise

For enterprise users, please visit seaweedfs.com for the SeaweedFS Enterprise Edition, which has a self-healing storage format with better data protection.

Back to TOC

License

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.

The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

Back to TOC

Stargazers over time

Stargazers over time

Description
SeaweedFS is a distributed storage system for object storage (S3), file systems, and Iceberg tables, designed to handle billions of files with O(1) disk access and effortless horizontal scaling.
Readme Apache-2.0 163 MiB
Languages
Go 81.6%
Rust 6.3%
templ 4.3%
Java 3%
Shell 1.8%
Other 2.8%