Files
seaweedFS/weed/shell/ec_rebalance_slots_test.go
Lisandro Pin 6b98b52acc Fix reporting of EC shard sizes from nodes to masters. (#7835)
SeaweedFS tracks EC shard sizes on topology data stuctures, but this information is never
relayed to master servers :( The end result is that commands reporting disk usage, such
as `volume.list` and `cluster.status`, yield incorrect figures when EC shards are present.

As an example for a simple 5-node test cluster, before...

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5]
        Disk hdd total size:88967096 file_count:172
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:88967096 file_count:172
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6]
        Disk hdd total size:77267536 file_count:166
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:77267536 file_count:166
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:77267536  file_count:166  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          volume id:3  size:88967096  file_count:172  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349617
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7]
        Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:166234632 file_count:338
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[8 9 10 11 12 13]
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:498703896 file_count:1014
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:498703896 file_count:1014
total size:498703896 file_count:1014
```

...and after:

```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5 9] sizes:[1:8.00 MiB 5:8.00 MiB 9:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:81761800 file_count:161
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:81761800 file_count:161
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[11 12 13] sizes:[11:8.00 MiB 12:8.00 MiB 13:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:88678712 file_count:170
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:88678712 file_count:170
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4 8] sizes:[0:8.00 MiB 4:8.00 MiB 8:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
          volume id:2  size:81761800  file_count:161  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          volume id:3  size:88678712  file_count:170  replica_placement:2  version:3  modified_at_second:1766349495
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6 10] sizes:[2:8.00 MiB 6:8.00 MiB 10:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:170440512 file_count:331
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
    Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
      DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
        Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
          ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7] sizes:[3:8.00 MiB 7:8.00 MiB] total:16.00 MiB
        Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
    Rack DefaultRack total size:511321536 file_count:993
  DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:511321536 file_count:993
total size:511321536 file_count:993
```
2025-12-28 19:30:42 -08:00

295 lines
10 KiB
Go
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
package shell
import (
"testing"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/pb/master_pb"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/storage/erasure_coding"
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/storage/types"
)
// TestECRebalanceWithLimitedSlots tests that EC rebalance handles the scenario
// where there are limited free slots on volume servers.
//
// This is a regression test for the error:
//
// "no free ec shard slots. only 0 left"
//
// Scenario (from real usage):
// - 6 volume servers in 6 racks
// - Each server has max=10 volume slots
// - 7 volumes were EC encoded (7 × 14 = 98 EC shards)
// - All 14 shards per volume are on the original server (not yet distributed)
//
// Expected behavior:
// - The rebalance algorithm should distribute shards across servers
// - Even if perfect distribution isn't possible, it should do best-effort
// - Currently fails with "no free ec shard slots" because freeSlots calculation
//
// doesn't account for shards being moved (freed slots on source, used on target)
func TestECRebalanceWithLimitedSlots(t *testing.T) {
// Build a topology matching the problematic scenario:
// 6 servers, each with 2+ volumes worth of EC shards (all 14 shards per volume on same server)
topology := buildLimitedSlotsTopology()
// Collect EC nodes from the topology
ecNodes, totalFreeEcSlots := collectEcVolumeServersByDc(topology, "", types.HardDriveType)
t.Logf("Topology summary:")
t.Logf(" Number of EC nodes: %d", len(ecNodes))
t.Logf(" Total free EC slots: %d", totalFreeEcSlots)
// Log per-node details
for _, node := range ecNodes {
shardCount := 0
for _, diskInfo := range node.info.DiskInfos {
for _, ecShard := range diskInfo.EcShardInfos {
shardCount += erasure_coding.ShardsCountFromVolumeEcShardInformationMessage(ecShard)
}
}
t.Logf(" Node %s (rack %s): %d shards, %d free slots",
node.info.Id, node.rack, shardCount, node.freeEcSlot)
}
// Calculate total EC shards
totalEcShards := 0
for _, node := range ecNodes {
for _, diskInfo := range node.info.DiskInfos {
for _, ecShard := range diskInfo.EcShardInfos {
totalEcShards += erasure_coding.ShardsCountFromVolumeEcShardInformationMessage(ecShard)
}
}
}
t.Logf(" Total EC shards: %d", totalEcShards)
// Document the issue:
// With 98 EC shards (7 volumes × 14 shards) on 6 servers with max=10 each,
// total capacity is 60 slots. But shards already occupy slots on their current servers.
//
// The current algorithm calculates free slots as:
// freeSlots = maxVolumeCount - volumeCount - ecShardCount
//
// If all shards are on their original servers:
// - Server A has 28 shards (2 volumes × 14) → may have negative free slots
// - This causes totalFreeEcSlots to be 0 or negative
//
// The EXPECTED improvement:
// - Rebalance should recognize that moving a shard FREES a slot on the source
// - The algorithm should work iteratively, moving shards one at a time
// - Even if starting with 0 free slots, moving one shard opens a slot
if totalFreeEcSlots < 1 {
// This is the current (buggy) behavior we're documenting
t.Logf("")
t.Logf("KNOWN ISSUE: totalFreeEcSlots = %d (< 1)", totalFreeEcSlots)
t.Logf("")
t.Logf("This triggers the error: 'no free ec shard slots. only %d left'", totalFreeEcSlots)
t.Logf("")
t.Logf("Analysis:")
t.Logf(" - %d EC shards across %d servers", totalEcShards, len(ecNodes))
t.Logf(" - Shards are concentrated on original servers (not distributed)")
t.Logf(" - Current slot calculation doesn't account for slots freed by moving shards")
t.Logf("")
t.Logf("Expected fix:")
t.Logf(" 1. Rebalance should work iteratively, moving one shard at a time")
t.Logf(" 2. Moving a shard from A to B: frees 1 slot on A, uses 1 slot on B")
t.Logf(" 3. The 'free slots' check should be per-move, not global")
t.Logf(" 4. Or: calculate 'redistributable slots' = total capacity - shards that must stay")
// For now, document this is a known issue - don't fail the test
// When the fix is implemented, this test should be updated to verify the fix works
return
}
// If we get here, the issue might have been fixed
t.Logf("totalFreeEcSlots = %d, rebalance should be possible", totalFreeEcSlots)
}
// TestECRebalanceZeroFreeSlots tests the specific scenario where
// the topology appears to have free slots but rebalance fails.
//
// This can happen when the VolumeCount in the topology includes the original
// volumes that were EC-encoded, making the free slot calculation incorrect.
func TestECRebalanceZeroFreeSlots(t *testing.T) {
// Build a topology where volumes were NOT deleted after EC encoding
// (VolumeCount still reflects the original volumes)
topology := buildZeroFreeSlotTopology()
ecNodes, totalFreeEcSlots := collectEcVolumeServersByDc(topology, "", types.HardDriveType)
t.Logf("Zero free slots scenario:")
for _, node := range ecNodes {
shardCount := 0
for _, diskInfo := range node.info.DiskInfos {
for _, ecShard := range diskInfo.EcShardInfos {
shardCount += erasure_coding.ShardsCountFromVolumeEcShardInformationMessage(ecShard)
}
}
t.Logf(" Node %s: %d shards, %d free slots, volumeCount=%d, max=%d",
node.info.Id, shardCount, node.freeEcSlot,
node.info.DiskInfos[string(types.HardDriveType)].VolumeCount,
node.info.DiskInfos[string(types.HardDriveType)].MaxVolumeCount)
}
t.Logf(" Total free slots: %d", totalFreeEcSlots)
if totalFreeEcSlots == 0 {
t.Logf("")
t.Logf("SCENARIO REPRODUCED: totalFreeEcSlots = 0")
t.Logf("This would trigger: 'no free ec shard slots. only 0 left'")
}
}
// buildZeroFreeSlotTopology creates a topology where rebalance will fail
// because servers are at capacity (volumeCount equals maxVolumeCount)
func buildZeroFreeSlotTopology() *master_pb.TopologyInfo {
diskTypeKey := string(types.HardDriveType)
// Each server has max=10, volumeCount=10 (full capacity)
// Free capacity = (10-10) * 10 = 0 per server
// This will trigger "no free ec shard slots" error
return &master_pb.TopologyInfo{
Id: "test_zero_free_slots",
DataCenterInfos: []*master_pb.DataCenterInfo{
{
Id: "dc1",
RackInfos: []*master_pb.RackInfo{
{
Id: "rack0",
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
{
Id: "127.0.0.1:8080",
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
diskTypeKey: {
Type: diskTypeKey,
MaxVolumeCount: 10,
VolumeCount: 10, // At full capacity
EcShardInfos: buildEcShards([]uint32{3, 4}),
},
},
},
},
},
{
Id: "rack1",
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
{
Id: "127.0.0.1:8081",
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
diskTypeKey: {
Type: diskTypeKey,
MaxVolumeCount: 10,
VolumeCount: 10,
EcShardInfos: buildEcShards([]uint32{1, 7}),
},
},
},
},
},
{
Id: "rack2",
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
{
Id: "127.0.0.1:8082",
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
diskTypeKey: {
Type: diskTypeKey,
MaxVolumeCount: 10,
VolumeCount: 10,
EcShardInfos: buildEcShards([]uint32{2}),
},
},
},
},
},
{
Id: "rack3",
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
{
Id: "127.0.0.1:8083",
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
diskTypeKey: {
Type: diskTypeKey,
MaxVolumeCount: 10,
VolumeCount: 10,
EcShardInfos: buildEcShards([]uint32{5, 6}),
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
}
}
func buildEcShards(volumeIds []uint32) []*master_pb.VolumeEcShardInformationMessage {
var shards []*master_pb.VolumeEcShardInformationMessage
for _, vid := range volumeIds {
si := erasure_coding.NewShardsInfo()
for _, id := range erasure_coding.AllShardIds() {
si.Set(id, 1234)
}
shards = append(shards, &master_pb.VolumeEcShardInformationMessage{
Id: vid,
Collection: "ectest",
EcIndexBits: si.Bitmap(),
ShardSizes: si.SizesInt64(),
})
}
return shards
}
// buildLimitedSlotsTopology creates a topology matching the problematic scenario:
// - 6 servers in 6 racks
// - Each server has max=10 volume slots
// - 7 volumes were EC encoded, shards distributed as follows:
// - rack0 (8080): volumes 3,4 → 28 shards
// - rack1 (8081): volumes 1,7 → 28 shards
// - rack2 (8082): volume 2 → 14 shards
// - rack3 (8083): volumes 5,6 → 28 shards
// - rack4 (8084): (no volumes originally)
// - rack5 (8085): (no volumes originally)
func buildLimitedSlotsTopology() *master_pb.TopologyInfo {
return &master_pb.TopologyInfo{
Id: "test_limited_slots",
DataCenterInfos: []*master_pb.DataCenterInfo{
{
Id: "dc1",
RackInfos: []*master_pb.RackInfo{
buildRackWithEcShards("rack0", "127.0.0.1:8080", 10, []uint32{3, 4}),
buildRackWithEcShards("rack1", "127.0.0.1:8081", 10, []uint32{1, 7}),
buildRackWithEcShards("rack2", "127.0.0.1:8082", 10, []uint32{2}),
buildRackWithEcShards("rack3", "127.0.0.1:8083", 10, []uint32{5, 6}),
buildRackWithEcShards("rack4", "127.0.0.1:8084", 10, []uint32{}),
buildRackWithEcShards("rack5", "127.0.0.1:8085", 10, []uint32{}),
},
},
},
}
}
// buildRackWithEcShards creates a rack with one data node containing EC shards
// for the specified volume IDs (all 14 shards per volume)
func buildRackWithEcShards(rackId, nodeId string, maxVolumes int64, volumeIds []uint32) *master_pb.RackInfo {
// Note: types.HardDriveType is "" (empty string), so we use "" as the key
diskTypeKey := string(types.HardDriveType)
return &master_pb.RackInfo{
Id: rackId,
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
{
Id: nodeId,
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
diskTypeKey: {
Type: diskTypeKey,
MaxVolumeCount: maxVolumes,
VolumeCount: int64(len(volumeIds)), // Original volumes still counted
EcShardInfos: buildEcShards(volumeIds),
},
},
},
},
}
}